Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Grannell v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Karla R. Grannell
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
State of Utah et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, The and Utah Division of Consumer Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hand v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Brea Hand
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Kizzy Williams
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Olson v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Jarred Olson
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. Ross Medical Care, P.C.
as 4:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Defendant:
Ross Medical Care, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Kansas, State of, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 5:2023cv04002
Plaintiff:
The State of Kansas, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General and Kansas, State of, ex rel., Derek Schmidt, Attorney General
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
