Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
H. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
M. H. and S. S.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, Ericsson and Ericsson Flexible Benefits Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
S. et al v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
S. S. and E. S.
Defendant:
CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and Intel Corporation Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
S. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
J. S. and S. S.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Head v. S & S Truck Specialties, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00334
Defendant:
S & S Truck Specialties, LLC and Clint Speer
Plaintiff:
Travis Head
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martin v. Jacobo et al
as 5:2020cv01313
Defendant:
S&S Trucking, James Arthur Settle, Juan Carlos Mendez Jacobo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drew v. Mack S&S Construction Co.
as 5:2020cv00679
Plaintiff:
Rodney Drew
Defendant:
Mack S&S Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salazar et al v. City of Boulder, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv01497
Defendant:
Ed Quayle, City of Boulder, Colorado and Shane Rodgers
Plaintiff:
S. S. and Keri Leigh Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
