Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Samsung Top-Load
as 20-6097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS MORGAN
Amicus Curiae:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and others
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA INC v. Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
as 1:2019cv02018
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
Plaintiff:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROYAN v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Joseph Troyan
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc and Samsung Electronics Company LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MDL 2792 SAMSUNG TOP-LOAD WASHING MACHINE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 5:2017ml02792
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Company LTD, Best Buy Co Inc and others
In Re:
Samsung Top-Load Washing Machine Marketing, Sales Practices And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wells, Carolyn Mccabe, Joseph Troyan and others
Interested Party:
Nagel Rice, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
John Douglas Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minoli et al v. LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
Walden Minoli, Walden Minoli, Walden Minoli and others
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Minoli et al v. LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
Walden Minoli, Walden Minoli, Walden Minoli and others
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Watson v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04033
Plaintiff:
James T Watson and James T Watson
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Weingarten et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp.
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Valdez
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp.
as 1:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Valdez
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
