Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Crump v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1420
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
C. HARVEY, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Martinez v. El Reno Oklahoma BOP et al
as 5:2024cv01065
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Hospital and El Reno Oklahoma BOP
Plaintiff:
Paul Corey Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. United States, et al
as 24-1332
Respondent:
REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIONS CUSTODIAN, N. DOMINGUEZ and others
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Bryant v. Oklahoma City FTC et al
as 5:2024cv00726
Respondent:
Oklahoma City FTC, Bop and Administration and FNU Zook
Petitioner:
Richard Lynn Bryant, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 24-1271
Respondent:
BOP, (NCRO), A. CILLIO, Warden, AW (PROGRAMS) COMPLEX and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1036
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, UNITED STATES PORBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO and others
Denney (PS) v. BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Lucas Denney
Respondent:
BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Poe v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Poe
Defendant:
State of Utah, USCF, CUCF and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
