Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peleus Insurance Company v. JITA Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff: Peleus Insurance Company
Defendant: JITA Contracting, Inc. and Federal Highway Administration of the United State Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Salt Lake City Corporation et al v. Shepherd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00893
Plaintiff: Salt Lake City Corporation, Sandy City Corporation and Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy
Defendant: Gloria M. Shepherd, Ivan Marrero, Federal Highway Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 21-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER, CANDELAS GLOWS/ROCKY FLATS GLOWS, ROCKY FLATS RIGHT TO KNOW and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Highlands Ranch Neighborhood v. Cater, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1190
Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, JOHN M. CATER, in his official capacity as the Division Administrator, Colorado Division of the Federal Highway Administration, SHAILEN P. BHATT, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Transportaion and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HIGHLANDS RANCH NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01017
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center , Candelas Glows/Rocky Flats Glows , Rocky Flats Right to Know and others
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service , Greg Sheehan , Ryan Zinke and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Zeppelin et al v. Federal Highway Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01661
Plaintiff: Kyle Zeppelin , Brad Evans , Christine O'Connor and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Prairie Band Pottawatomie, et al v. Federal Highway Administration, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant: PRAIRIE BAND POTTAWATOMIE NATION, SIERRA CLUB, WETLANDS PRESERVATION ORGANIZATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: J. MICHAEL BOWER, in his official capacity as Division Administrator of the Federal Highway and DEBRA L. MILLER, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Kansas Department of Transportation
Defendant: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Prairie Band Pottawatomie Nation et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02534
Plaintiff: Prairie Band Pottawatomie Nation, Prairie Band Pottawatomie Nation, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Kansas Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Pontius v. H-K Contractors Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00216
Plaintiff: David A Pontius
Defendant: H-K Contractors Inc, S & L Industrial and Federal Highway Administration Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Morrison-Laurant v. H-K Contractors Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00211
Plaintiff: DiAnn G Morrison-Laurant
Defendant: H-K Contractors Inc, S & L Industrial and Federal Highway Administration Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?