Cases 1 - 10 of 1,095
Jing v. Garland
as 24-9540
Petitioner:
SHUANGFA JING
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Toj-Riz v. Garland
as 24-9533
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO TOJ-RIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Chacon Ovalle v. Garland
as 24-9530
Petitioner:
LIDIA GUISE CHACON OVALLE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Manuel-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-9526
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
