Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Loggins (PS) v. El Paso County Combined Court et al
as 1:2023cv03400
Petitioner:
Vincent E. Loggins
Respondent:
El Paso County Combined Court and Philip Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Roe v. Wade et al.
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Defendant:
USA, Roe v. Wade, Senate Bill #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Mangosa et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins and Loggings
Defendant:
Micheele, Elija Ballard Craft, Ben Mangosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Fisher, et al
as 1:2014cv02652
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Respondent:
Birget Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Jackson et al
as 1:2013cv02816
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Respondent:
Michael Jackson, Diana Ross, Smoky Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Loggins v. USA, et al
as 1:2013cv01790
Petitioner:
Vincent E. Loggins
Respondent:
Jonathon Suthers and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Bernal et al.
as 1:2012cv00456
Petitioner:
Vincent E. Loggins
Respondent:
Theresa Bernal and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loggins v. Colorado Mental Health Insitute at Pueblo, The
as 1:2010cv01124
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Defendant:
Colorado Mental Health Insitute at Pueblo, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Ross
as 1:2010cv00885
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Defendant:
Diana Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Colorado Mental Health Insitute at Pueblo, The et al
as 1:2010cv00851
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Defendant:
Colorado Mental Health Insitute at Pueblo, The and Department of Health and Human Services, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
