Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Fresh Vision OP, Inc. et al v. Skoglund et al
as 5:2024cv04055
Defendant:
Chris Burger, Earl Glynn, Samuel Klaassen and others
Plaintiff:
Fresh Vision OP, Inc., James G. Muir and Chengny Thao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Kelley et al
as 6:2021cv01032
Defendant:
Spencer C. Kelley and Vision Communications KS, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hanna D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Forward Science LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv02399
Defendant:
NSK Americas Inc., Vector R&D, Inc., Brasseler USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gust v. Wireless Vision, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02646
Plaintiff:
Bradley Gust
Defendant:
Wireless Vision, LLC , David Naas and Anthony Sawara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gray et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02642
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Gray and Danyelle D. Westphal
Defendant:
Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Youngman v. Vision Financial Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Youngman
Defendant:
Vision Financial Corp. and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cooper v. Control Vision Corp. et al
as 2:2011cv02632
Plaintiff:
William D. Cooper
Defendant:
Control Vision Corp. and John Jay Humbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williamson v. Ronvelia et al
as 6:2011cv01120
Defendant:
Vijaykumar Ronvelia and Vision Hotels, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
