Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Frazier v. Shelby County Corrections Facility et al
as 2:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Laron Frazier
Defendant:
Shelby County Corrections Facility, Parker, Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acoff v. Parker et al
as 5:2009cv02543
Plaintiff:
Marco Dane Acoff
Defendant:
Charles Lynn Parker, Ottie L Newsom, Kermit L. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. White et al
as 2:2009cv01220
Petitioner:
Betty Jane Parker
Respondent:
Cynthia White, State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lilly v. Parker et al
as 2:2008cv01943
Petitioner:
Myron Keith Lilly
Respondent:
Janet Parker and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lilly v. Parker, et al.
as 2:2008cv01702
Plaintiff:
Myron Keith Lilly
Defendant:
Janet Parker and D.A. of Shelby County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Marcum et al
as 5:2008cv00929
Petitioner:
Ashley Doral Parker
Respondent:
Terry Marcum, Terry Marcum, Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Marcum et al
as 4:2008cv00890
Petitioner:
Ashley Doral Parker
Respondent:
Terry Marcum and Attorney General of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Cone et al
as 4:2008cv00795
Plaintiff:
Ashley Doral Parker
Defendant:
Gary Cone, Terry Marcum, Troy King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Truett et al
as 4:2008cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ashley Doral Parker
Defendant:
R Truett, Blake L Dorning, Chris Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Smith, et al.
as 4:2008cv00756
Plaintiff:
Ashley Doral Parker
Defendant:
Shirley Smith, Terry Marcum, Gary Cone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
