Cases 101 - 110 of 1,461
Gaddis v. Ivy et al
as 1:2021cv00588
Respondent:
Kay Ivy, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Chief Justice
Petitioner:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cokely v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2021cv00516
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Donald Chadwick Cokely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamby v. Kilgore et al
as 4:2021cv00556
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hamby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00551
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Dontrell C Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00741
Petitioner:
Darrell Donzell Burgess
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Jeffrey Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaddis v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2021cv00575
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00354
Petitioner:
Donnie W Brown
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Defoe v. Wise et al
as 5:2021cv00372
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynn Defoe
Respondent:
B. Chadwick Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibbs v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00445
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Kenneth Peters
Petitioner:
Jermaine L Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Warden Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv00336
Petitioner:
Coleman Shaeffer and Shaeffer Coleman
Respondent:
Warden Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
