Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FNU BERMAN, FNU PHELPS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Oriyomi Aloba v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 23-13386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORIYOMI ALOBA and ORIYOMI SADDIQ ALOBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Robert Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers FNU, et al
as 23-12898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CONYERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AYERS FNU, KITCHEN FNU, PERKINS FNU and others
Randy Black v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-13638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY LAMAR BLACK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP ATLANTA UNKNOWN WARDEN, USP ATLANTA MEDICAL STAFF and others
Tavares Farrington v. USP Atlanta Warden, et al
as 22-13301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVARES LENARD FARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN, MORENO, HARDIN and others
Antonio Edwards v. FBOP Prison Officials of USP Coleman 1, et al
as 22-12994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO EDWARDS, a.k.a. Tank a.k.a. Tony Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
FBOP PRISON OFFICIALS OF USP COLEMAN 1, FRUIT, SIS Tech - Individual Capacity, LEMOS, CMC of USP Coleman 1 - Individual Capacity and others
Calvin James v. Coleman USP 1
as 22-11304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
COLEMAN USP 1, Psychology Department
Jose Rivera v. Ruben LeBron, et al
as 18-13292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
RUBEN LEBRON, Senior Officer, USP Coleman I, TODD BRASFIELD, Senior Officer, USP Coleman I and ADRIAN BILLINGS, Senior Officer, USP Coleman I
Randy Black v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 18-12913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY LAMAR BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN
Jose Montalban v. John Doe, et al
as 18-11697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MONTALBAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, S.I.S. Officer's, FNU BOLLEY, Unit manager for B-Unit, FNU SMITH, Case Manager B Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
