Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Robert Modrall v. Bob Corker, et al
as 15-15121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G. MODRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB CORKER and BILL KILLIAN, et al.,
Christian McCorley v. Nancy Bills, et al
as 15-12016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN MCCORLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY N. BILLS, DAMION OVERSTREET and ROCKDALE COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tina Windham v. City of Fairhope, Alabama, et al
as 14-12475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA DIANE WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA, TRENT SCOTT, DAMIAN REHORN and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reginald Green v. State of Florida, et al
as 14-10769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ROD SMITH, BILL CERVONE and others
Reginald Green v. State of Florida, et al
as 14-10289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ROD SMITH, BILL CERVONE and others
Mark Denico, et al v. Florida State Fair Authority, et al
as 13-15761
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK DENICO, THOMAS GRISWOLD, JR., TIMOTHY NEWBERRY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY, BILL BULLOCK, individually ad Officially, MAJOR AL GRECO, indiviually and Officially and others
Reeves Alexander Reeves v. J. A. Wilbanks, et al
as 12-16611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REEVES ALEXANDER REEVES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. A. WILBANKS, GCPS Board of Education Superintendent, JAMES TAYLOR, Executive Director, WAYNE RIKARD, Chief and others
Arelious Muckle v. UNCF, et al
as 12-15048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARELIOUS MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNCF, a.k.a. United Negro College Fund and BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION, a.k.a. Gates Foundation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
