Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, et al
as 24-10254
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN T FOWLKES, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Chanon Miller v. Juan Ramirez, et al
as 23-13753
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHANON MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN F. RAMIREZ, STEVEN L. MURRAY, DANIEL S. FELLOWS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fredrika Miller, et al v. Montgomery Police Department, et al
as 23-11776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRIKA MORRISSETTE MILLER and GARY L. SAUER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY POLICE DEPARTMENT and ALEA
Fredrika Miller, et al v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 23-11372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRIKA MORRISSETTE MILLER and GARY L. SAUER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
James Cuyler v. Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 23-10717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. CUYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, BAY PINES VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, PAUL RUSSO and others
Tomika Miller, et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia
as 22-13445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOMIKA MILLER and ESTATE OF RAYSHARD BROOKS, by and through Tomika Miller, Administrator
Defendant / Appellant:
GARRETT ROLFE
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Miller v. Steven D. Grimberg
as 22-12503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and STEVEN D. GRIMBERG
Kevin Roberson, et al v. Albert Miller, et al
as 22-11471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEVIN ROBERSON and KHALIL ABDULLAH
Defendant / Appellant:
ALBERT J. MILLER and RONNETTA L. COATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
