Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Mike Redford v. William Duffey, Jr., et al
as 18-10845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE REDFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUFFEY, JR. and JANET KING
Tavarious King v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-13123
Petitioner - Appellant:
TAVARIOUS KING
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mike Redford v. Judge William Duffey, Jr.,, et al
as 17-12840
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIKE REDFORD, Pre-Eminent Jurist
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDGE WILLIAM DUFFEY, JR. and MAGISTRATE JANET KING
Joe Holt, Jr. v. Robert Baker, et al
as 17-12714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE DANIEL HOLT, JR., Nine vehicles/one motorcycle and $4892.00 US currency
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. BAKER, KRISTI A. VALLS, MIKE BLAKELY and others
Gregory King v. USA
as 17-11506
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY KING
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Avery Patterson v. D. Valentine, et al
as 17-11463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVERY PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. VALENTINE, Colonel, O. PEAVEY, Major, G. P. KING, Captain and others
Edward King v. Warden, et al
as 17-11391
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD LAVAR KING
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
USA v. Sherond King
as 17-11053
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHEROND DURON KING
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Douglas Marshall, et al v. Tomoka CI
as 16-17608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL, of the family of Yahweh, the Creator, Prophets, Priests and Kings of Almighty Yahweh, Private-Man, Natural Free-Man, Non-Persons, Non-Individuals, Non-Prisoners, Non-Inmates, Non-Fiction, Flesh and Blood, Living Soul-Man, Private Citizen, JAMMORA ISHMEAL and LIONEL JERMAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMOKA CI
Anthony King v. USA
as 16-16029
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY ROOSEVELT KING
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
