Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Joseph Sweeney v. Erin Walter, et al
as 14-12575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH MORRIS SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIN MASSEY WALTER, MARION COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and STATE OF FLORIDA
Steve Morris v. Pricilla Kitt, et al
as 14-11493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE A. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRICILLA KITT, Counselor, PREA Coordinator, TERRI BUSSEY, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, STANLEY SHEPHERD, Warden and others
Glenn Smith v. Sgt. T. Deemer, et al
as 14-10016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN C. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
T. DEEMER, Sgt., in his individual capacity, C. GARRETT SANCHEZ, in her individual and official capacities, V. KING, in his individual and official capacities and others
Morris Smith v. Clay Tatem
as 13-15690
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS E. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAY TATEM
Morris Ricks v. Albert Murray
as 13-14237
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICK MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ALBERT MURRAY
Matthew Morris v. Paul May, et al
as 13-13996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW PAUL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL C. MAY, Sheriff, RONALD WHITE, Jail Admin. and SONYA OLDHAM, Head Nurse, sued in their individual and official capacities
Jerome Ellis v. Moody, et al
as 13-13760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MOODY, N. P. SELESKA, STEVENSON and others
Morris Green v. USA
as 13-12641
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS DEWAYNE GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raymond Morris v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 13-11723
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Donald Smith v. Valdosta SP Warden, et al
as 13-11246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD FRANK SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
VALDOSTA SP WARDEN, TED PHILBIN, Deputy Warden of Valdosta SP, TONY MORRIS, Unit Manager of Valdosta SP Annex and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
