Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Sedrick Hills v. Pickens County, Alabama, et al
as 23-12427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEDRICK HILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
PICKENS COUNTY, ALABAMA, C. RINEHART and DENISE HASTY
Fortune Hill v. USA
as 23-11811
Petitioner / Appellant:
FORTUNE TYRONE HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ryan Hill v. USA
as 23-11489
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN VINCENT HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Everette Hill v. USA
as 22-13437
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVERETTE HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Malcolm Washington v. George Barnhill, et al
as 22-10642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM ZABAD WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE BARNHILL, (State Bar No. 039275) State of Georgia/City of Waycross, individual and official capacities, RANDY F. ROYAL, State of Georgia/Ware County, individual and official capacities, CARL JAMES and others
John Hawthorne v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-12027
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN HILL HAWTHORNE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
