Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 802
Alan Curtis v. Robyn Mislevy, et al
as 24-12039
Plaintiff: ALAN BOYD CURTIS
Defendant: ROBYN PAULINE MISLEVY, JOSHUA M. DRESCHEL, JAMES BRANDON JOHNSON and others
James Cobb, III v. USA
as 24-11264
Petitioner: JAMES LEE COBB, III
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Zebranek, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11972
Petitioner: JAMES D. ZEBRANEK, JR.
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Derrick James v. The Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 24-11458
Plaintiff: DERRICK GREGORY JAMES
Defendant: THE GEO GROUP, INC., ASSISTANT WARDEN, UXAVIER BROOMSFIELD and others
Julius Larry, IV v. Wilcox SP Warden
as 24-11912
Petitioner: JULIUS JAMES LARRY, IV
Respondent: WILCOX SP WARDEN
Miriam Tidwell v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 24-11228
Plaintiff: MIRIAM TIDWELL, Administrator of the Estate of James O'Quinn, Deceased
Defendant: JEFFERSON DUNN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections in his offical and individual capacities, DEBORA TONEY, In her official and individual capacities, WARDEN, STATON CF and others
Curtis Williams v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11932
Plaintiff: CURTIS ANDREW WILLIAMS
Defendant: GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, TYRONE OLIVER, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and others
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant: KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Mary Barton, et al
as 24-11653
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Julius Larry, IV v. Noah Abrams, et al
as 24-11169
Plaintiff: JULIUS JAMES LARRY, IV
Defendant: NOAH ABRAMS, HERBERT HARLEY, JONATHAN COUR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?