Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Michael Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11332
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROGER MILLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nicholas Rogers v. USA
as 23-12920
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS RENEE ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelvin Frazier v. Hernandez, et al
as 22-13959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer, Okeechobee C.I., in official and individual capacities, ROGERS, Colonel, Okeechobee C.I., in official and individual capacities, J. COX, Asst. Warden of Program, Okeechobee C.I., in official and individual capacities and others
Roger Shaw v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-11940
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER SHAW
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Roger King v. Angielea Henry, et al
as 18-11237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGIELEA HENRY, Deputy Warden Care & Treatment, PHYLLIS ALLEN, Medical Admiin and GARDNER, Medical Director
Roger Yoakum v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 18-10552
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER YOAKUM
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Roger Smith v. Florida Commission on Offender
as 17-14555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Brian Pemberton v. J. Giglio, et al
as 17-13457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN C. PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL GIGLIO, and the Law Office of J. Michael Giglio, R. KEVIN SILVEY, and the Law Office of R.Kevin Silvey, ADAM C. CATHEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
