Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 23-10120
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-13031
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12811
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Andrew Suh v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 22-11077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW SUH
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-10954
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-10393
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. US District Court Eastern NY, et al
as 21-14517
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
US DISTRICT COURT EASTERN NY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Edward Barber v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 18-13063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD EUGENE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL COURTS OF GEORGIA, ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT and others
Ernest Mallety v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 17-15447
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST MALLETY
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Andre Leffebre v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 17-11267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Health Services Department; and Psychology Services Branch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
