Cases 151 - 160 of 5,999
Stewart Persinger v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10060
Plaintiff:
STEWART PERSINGER
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OTHER UNKNOWN, Doc and Inspector General Employees
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Danny Hammond v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10025
Petitioner:
DANNY HAMMOND
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edward Austin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10039
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Larry Bishins v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser
as 24-10008
Plaintiff:
LARRY V. BISHINS
Defendant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Christopher Watts v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10005
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WATTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Kathryn Walker v. Secretary of the Army, et al
as 23-14229
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN WALKER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Dalvin Denson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-14165
Petitioner:
DALVIN DENSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brian Kane, et al v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 23-14192
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PATRICK KANE, ZAYNE ANEED ELIAS OTERO, CAMILO ANDRES OROZCO ELIAS and others
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR SERVICE CENTER OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Henry Sowers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 23-14149
Petitioner:
HENRY SOWERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
