Cases 11 - 20 of 30
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-13486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., DAVID JAMES and BRAIN BARRS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN J. CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and THOMAS J. TICKNER, in his Official Capacity as Commander, Savannah District of the US Army Corps of Engineers
:
SERVICE
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-13486
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., BRAIN BARRS and DAVID JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN J. CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and THOMAS J. TICKNER, in his Official Capacity as Commander, Savannah District of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, In, et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-14745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor - Appellee:
ALABAMA COAL ASSOCIATION, MS & R EQUIPMENT CO., INC., REED MINERALS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and JON CHYTKA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District
State of Georgia, et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 15-13252
Petitioner:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS), in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection, et al
as 15-13102
Petitioner:
SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC., GEORGIA AGRIBUSINESS COUNCIL, INC. and GREATER ATLANTA HOMEBUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-13739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and DAVID JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and JON CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-13739
Defendant / Appellee:
JON CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES and GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC.
Interested Party:
FLORIDA CARRY, INC.
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 14-13392
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC. and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC.
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-12357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, JON CHYTKA, U.S. Arm Corps of Engineers, Mobile District and others
:
SERVICE
City of Dania Beach Florida, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer
as 13-14143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF DANIA BEACH FLORIDA, RAE SANDLER and GRANT CAMPBELL
Intervenor - Appellee:
BROWARD COUNTY
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
