Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Roy Nutt, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-12524
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROY A. NUTT and BONNIE W. NUTT
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Jared Widman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-12478
Petitioner / Appellant:
JARED C. WIDMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Lori Patitz, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-12440
Petitioner / Appellant:
LORI MICHELLE PATITZ and ANDREW ROBERT MOODY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
George Teacherson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-11647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE A. TEACHERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Todd Kohout, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-11135
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD KOHOUT and LISA M. KOHOUT
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Betty Amos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-10532
Petitioner:
BETTY AMOS
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Rita D Taylor v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
as 22-13686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RITA D. TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PAULA MCCORMACK, Supervisor, Revenue Officer (Retired) and others
Ryan Roath v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-13799
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN MICHAEL ROATH
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ronald Howland, Jr., et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-13744
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD W. HOWLAND, JR. and MARILEE R. HOWLAND
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
David E. Stone, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 22-13217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID E. STONE, KARI S. CARROLL and DAVID DEPADRO
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
