Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,683
Carl Woods v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10822
Petitioner: CARL EZEKIEL WOODS
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
James Ballone v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10809
Petitioner: JAMES BALLONE
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Clarence Palmore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10796
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEROY PALMORE
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Austin Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10790
Petitioner: AUSTIN ISAAC HAMILTON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gersu Guisao v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10780
Petitioner: GERSU GUISAO
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Daniel O. Conahan, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10844
Petitioner: DANIEL O CONAHAN, JR.
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Larry White, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10739
Petitioner: LARRY FELTON WHITE, JR.
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10686
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Louis Larocca v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10695
Petitioner: LOUIS LAROCCA
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Raytaurus Armstrong v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 24-10698
Petitioner: RAYTAURUS EMON ARMSTRONG
Respondent: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?