Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Maraist Law Firm, PA, et al v. Alan Rose, et al
as 23-12030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARAIST LAW FIRM, PA, PATRICK MARAIST and MARAIST LAW FIRM
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN BENJAMIN ROSE, ROBERT ABRUZZO, TIMOTHY WARREN SCHULZ and others
Patrick Maraist v. Alan Rose, et al
as 23-12012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK MARAIST and MARAIST LAW FIRM
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN BENJAMIN ROSE, ROBERT ABRUZZO, TIMOTHY WARREN SCHULZ and others
Maraist Law Firm, PA, et al v. Howard Coates, Jr., et al
as 23-10994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARAIST LAW FIRM, PA and PATRICK MARAIST
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD KELLY COATES, JR., CYMONIE ROWE, FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY and others
Patrick Maraist v. Howard Coates, Jr., et al
as 22-11412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK MARAIST
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD KELLY COATES, JR., CYMONIE ROWE, FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY and others
West Morgan - East Lawrence v. Charles Owens, et al
as 17-12381
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES OWENS, ANGELIA ABBASI, MOHAMMAD ABBASI and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, TOMMY LINDSEY, LANETTE LINDSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC and DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.
:
SERVICE
Dependable Component Supply, I v. Carrefour Informatique Trembla, et al
as 12-11117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEPENDABLE COMPONENT SUPPLY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CARREFOUR INFORMATIQUE TREMBLANT, INC., ASHFORD FINANCE, LLC, FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF ILLINOIS and others
Kevin Ashford v. City of Riverdale, et al
as 10-11038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ASHFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERDALE, DERRY WALKER, in his individual and official capacity as code enforcement officer for the City of Riverdale, DOUGLAS MANNING, in his individual and official capacity as community development director for the City of Riverdale and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
