Cases 1 - 10 of 710
Jason Hunter, Sr. v. Florida State Hospital, et al
as 24-11844
Petitioner:
JASON T. HUNTER
Respondent:
FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'EL v. State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11825
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA LICENSE #060588618 and others
George Brewster, III v. Arthur Smith
as 24-11763
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
ARTHUR L. SMITH, Superior Court of Muscogee County
James Esseks, et alIn re: James Esseks, et al
as 24-11618
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL CHARLES, LATISHA FAULKS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Christopher Miles v. Leon County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-11593
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, LEON COUNTY JAIL and LEON COUNTY COURT
In re: Thomas McClary, et al
as 24-11397
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS MCCLARY and FIFTH AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, DAVID FISH and others
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11171
Petitioner:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Respondent:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11170
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Defendant:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
In re: Marcus Wright
as 24-11155
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS WRIGHT
Respondent:
USP COLEMAN II WARDEN and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
David Ratcliff v. Darlene Tyler, et al
as 24-11096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARC RATCLIFF
Defendant:
DARLENE TYLER, CARLOS SILVA, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
