Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jacqueline Spencer v. City of Orlando, Florida, et al
as 16-15533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE M. SPENCER, Individually and as Personal Representative of Marquis Spencer, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, MICHAEL ZAMBITO, Officer and PAUL EVANCOE, Officer
Marcus Cull v. City of Orlando, Florida, et al
as 16-14804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS CULL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, CARLOS VILLAVERDE, individually and MATHEW FLEURY, individually
Jennifer Arnold Rogers v. City of Orlando, Florida, et al
as 15-13198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER R. ARNOLD ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, a Municipal corporation and RUDY RODRIGUEZ, in his individual capacity
Dwaine Hargis v. City of Orlando, Florida, et al
as 13-14290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAINE HARGIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA and THEODIS SPRINGER
Scott Zabriskie v. John Doe No. 1, et al
as 12-15752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT R. ZABRISKIE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3 and others
MCO Airport Concessions, LLC, et al v. Greater Orlando Aviation Autho, et al
as 12-11400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCO AIRPORT CONCESSIONS, LLC, ORLANDO AIRSIDE INVESTMENTS, LLC, SUPERIOR HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY, CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, STEVE GARDNER and others
Scott Zabriskie v. John Doe No. 1, et al
as 11-15826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT R. ZABRISKIE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3 and others
Henry McCone v. City of Orlando, et al
as 11-14103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY MCCONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida, SCOTT ZOLLARS, individually and in their official capacities, CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
