Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bradley Dorman v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-12224
Defendant:
ROBINSON, J. HOLTZ and RICKY DIXON
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DORMAN
Avion Lawson v. B Stephenson, et al
as 24-12110
Defendant:
B STEPHENSON, JOHN HOLTZ, B SAINTIL and others
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Kelvin Frazier v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-11705
Defendant:
J. ROBINSON, J. HOLTZ, A. JOHN and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Kelvin Frazier v. S. Esson, et al
as 24-11654
Defendant:
S. MILLIKEN, Martin Correctional Institution, J G MCKUHEN, Martin Correctional Institution, S ESSON, Martin Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Avion Lawson v. John Holtz, et al
as 24-11153
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN HOLTZ, V. MALDONADO, RUEDA and others
Shawn McDuffie v. Centurion of Florida, LLC, et al
as 23-12179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHRISTOPHER MCDUFFIE
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, JORGE DELGADO, FRANCK PAPILLON and others
Kelvin Frazier v. Yves Resilard, et al
as 23-11895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
YVES RESILARD, Chief Health Officer, Martin C.I., CENTURION OF FLORIDA, Private Company doing business with FDOC, J. HOLTZ, Assistant Warden of Programs, Martin C.I. and others
Tracy Freeman v. T. Bowden, et al
as 21-13255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BOWDEN, Secretary Representative, in individual and official capacities, R. BRYNER, Warden Martin Correctional Institution, in individual capacity, J. HOLTZ, Warden Martin Correctional Institution, in individual capacity and others
Jim McDuf v. Bryner, et al
as 21-10852
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYNER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MCGEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIM MCDUF
Michael Nelson v. Steven Parker, et al
as 20-11012
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BRYNER, JOHN HOLTZ and STEVEN PARKER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE NELSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
