Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reinier Angulo v. The Shyft Group Usa, Inc., et al
as 23-13599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINIER ANGULO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHYFT GROUP USA, INC.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
National Labor Relations Board v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 23-11340
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-11076
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, FL, et al
as 23-10916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, BROWARD COUNTY, FLA, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court Broward County, et al
as 23-10913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT BROWARD COUNTY, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Reinier Angulo v. The Shyft Group Usa, Inc., et al
as 23-10927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINIER ANGULO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHYFT GROUP USA, INC., WORKHORSE CUSTOM CHASSIS, LLC, NAVISTAR, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 23-10758
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
The Estate of Samuel I. Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 22-13043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, KYLE ROIG, an individual, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
