Cases 21 - 30 of 21,507
Rodriguez v. Beamer
as 6:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
John D.W. Beamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brutsman v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 8:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Michael Brutsman
Defendant:
Raytheon Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Other:
Jeffrey Carter Andersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Marcano et al v. Orange County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Marlon Marcano, Yma Su-Ling and Yma Su-Ling Scarbriel
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Office, Samir Paulino and Kenneth Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crosby et al v. City of Titusville, Florida et al
as 6:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Natasha Crosby and Peter Crosby
Defendant:
City of Titusville, Florida and Steven Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Ocala Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Eddie Scott
Defendant:
Ocala Police Department, Crystal Blanton, Marion County Fifth Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
