Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Charles v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Whitney J. Charles
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Bill Prummell, Patrick Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gibson
as 6:2023cv02476
Plaintiff:
Tarick Donta Harris
Defendant:
Casey R. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patel v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2023cv02924
Petitioner:
Sean Casey Patel
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcello III v. Desantis et al
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Anthony Francis Marcello III
Defendant:
Casey Desantis, Gov Ron Desantis and Sarasota County Sherriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Riley et al
as 3:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Gregory Donte Willis
Defendant:
Darren Riley, Judson Crawford, Mave Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Bonnet et al
as 8:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Akhnaten Casey
Defendant:
J. Bonnet and J. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Davis
as 3:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Don Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Captain Lee, Sgt. Bostic, D. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Martin Der Ovanesian, Federal Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Colonel Hendley and Sgt. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
