Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Thompson v. Wolven Threads, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sarah Thompson
Defendant:
Wolven Threads, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
SARAH PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sanchez-Mayen v. City of St. Petersburg et al
as 8:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Mr. Heriberto A Sanchez-Mayen
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, Michael Thacker and Sarah Gaddis
Other:
Stacy Estes Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trujillo v. Delhi Style Food Inc
as 6:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sarah Trujillo
Defendant:
Delhi Style Food Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bulla et al v. Neal et al
as 8:2023cv02614
Plaintiff:
Angela Bulla and Sarah Bulla
Defendant:
Druye Neal, Dru Lawler, The Standard Fire Insurance Company and others
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Palmer v. La Rosa Realty LLC
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Sarah Elizabeth Palmer
Defendant:
La Rosa Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Royal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02617
Plaintiff:
Sarah Royal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
