Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Qatalyst Inc v. Pipes.AI, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Qatalyst Inc
Defendant:
Pipes.AI, LLC, 805Guru,LLC and Drew Thorne-Thomsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fulford v. Kilgo et al
as 3:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Thorn A. Fulford
Defendant:
Hannah Kilgo and Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearn v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Thorne Deon Hearn
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Chief Singleton, Sergeant Hammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorne v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2021cv00321
Defendant:
D. White, B. Jackson, R.C. Cheatham and others
Plaintiff:
Antowan Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorne v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2020cv00520
Defendant:
D. White, Bryant Jackson, FNU Tidwell and others
Plaintiff:
Antowan Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thornes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00347
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Chris Leonard Thornes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thornes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00296
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Chris Leonard Thornes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NWL, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc. et al
as 6:2019mc00062
Defendant:
Thomas G. Thorn, Daniel J. Kirk, Daniel J. Kirk Associates and others
Plaintiff:
NWL, Inc.
Young v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00509
Defendant:
A Gannon, The United States of America, John / Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorne v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv01072
Plaintiff:
Barry Thorne
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
