Cases 1 - 10 of 32
HINES v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Robert Hines
Defendant:
Valerie Jones, Christopher Dille, Tyler Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RIVAZ v. COOK et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
JARREL RIVAZ
Defendant:
JACOB COOK, RAFAEL FRANCISCO, RAYMOND MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BATCHELOR et al v. ROLSTON et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Defendant:
PAUL ROLSTON, NAKAMOTO GROUP, INC. and NAKAMOTO GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CASTRO, QRUINTRELL COOK, CONNIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOKS v. MINYARD et al
as 3:2021cv00776
Defendant:
CORPORAL THOMAS PASCHAL, GULF COAST AUTOPSY PHYSICIANS, TRACY MORTON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANADA COOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANCE v. COOK et al
as 4:2019cv00335
Defendant:
Margaret Zabijaka, NABORS, GIBLIN & NICKERSON, P.A., CONSTANGY, and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY M CHANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MAJORS et al v. MARSHALL et al
as 4:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
ATTORNEY MARIE A MATTOX, DANA GOODMAN-COOK and ANDREA MAJORS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY KAYLA SCARPONE, ATTORNEY WILLIAM GRAHAM, ATTORNEY ALISON SAUSAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POWELL v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2017cv00453
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT SIMMONS, DELRIKOS A BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
