Cases 41 - 50 of 89
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF FLORIDA , DADE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SPIRES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2016cv00337
Plaintiff:
DARTAGNAN N SPIRES
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY OF FLORIDA and PANAMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WOODS et al
as 4:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
MIKE WOODS, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE MAYOR, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETTIS v. WILLIS
as 3:2016cv00582
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L BETTIS
Defendant:
WILLIS, TIBITS, WORRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2016cv00286
Petitioner:
CARLOS MORGADO
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CITY OF TAMPA, PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUCHAM v. FRANKLIN COUNTY GOV ENTITY et al
as 4:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
WILLIE FRED BAUCHAM
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY GOV ENTITY, SKIP SHIVER, MICHAEL DUHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BERNARD HAMILTON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRIAN KRAMER, ERIC ANDREW ATRIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FL et al
as 1:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FL, JOHN RUTHERFORD, ANGELA COREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. COMCAR INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant:
COMCAR INDUSTRIES INC, COMMERCIAL CARRIER CORPORATION, CTL DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DADE COUNTY, CITY OF OPA-LOCKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
