Cases 1 - 10 of 72
STANLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
RE'XAVION JAVARIES STANLEY
Defendant:
AARON WILLIAMS, DUSTIN PATTERSON, MATTHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. BAKER et al
as 5:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO L GREEN
Defendant:
S BAKER, CLOUD, MCCLENDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. BAKER et al
as 5:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO L GREEN
Defendant:
S BAKER, M BROWN, D MADDOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SENATUS v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
SHANE BAKER and PENDER SENATUS
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
LARRY MORRIS and RICKY FULTON
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, JACQUELYN BLACKMON, T W TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. FLORES
as 3:2023cv01948
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BAKER
Respondent:
R FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. RATHEL et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JALYN K BAKER
Defendant:
OFFICER D RATHEL, SERGEANT T SAPP, D RATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. BAKER et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO L GREEN
Defendant:
S BAKER, M BROWN, D MADDOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
