Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Lynch v. Peryam et al
as 1:2010cv22020
Plaintiff:
John Lynch
Defendant:
Bob Peryam, Ms. Peryam, Tommy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirley v. Perryam et al
as 4:2010cv10020
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robert Shirley
Defendant:
Robert Perryam, Timothy Age, Johnathon Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Boswell et al
as 2:2010cv14028
Plaintiff:
Bernard K. Smart
Defendant:
A. Boswell, J. Crane, Okeechobee Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Boswell et al
as 2:2010cv14012
Plaintiff:
Bernard K Smart
Defendant:
A Boswell, J Crane, Okeechobee Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Monroe County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2009cv10117
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Schmidt
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Harper and Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shepard v. Crane et al
as 4:2009cv10063
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Shepard
Defendant:
Jonathan Crane, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. Monroe County Sherriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2009cv10043
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Schmidt
Defendant:
Monroe County Sherriffs Dept., Harper and Crane
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schmidt v. Monroe County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2008cv10095
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Schmidt
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Dept., Harper and Crane
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henderson v. Aramark et al
as 2:2008cv14078
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Henderson
Defendant:
Aramark, M. Carroll, Brenda Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Phelps et al
as 4:2007cv10084
Plaintiff:
Antonio Leonardo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Powell and Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
