Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv20737
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv20680
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105
Griffith v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv20096
Plaintiff: Andy Sandy Griffith
Defendant: United States of America and US Department of Homeland Security Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sibley v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2013cv21791
Plaintiff: Charles J. Sibley
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , Attorney General of the United States , US Attorney Miami, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Petrone v. US Department of Homeland Security (CBP)
as 0:2011cv61624
Plaintiff: Stephen Joseph Petrone
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security (CBP)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv22791
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Vongpanich v. (ICE) Department of Immigration and Customs Services et al
as 1:2010cv21196
Plaintiff: Burin Vongpanich
Defendant: (ICE) Department of Immigration and Customs Services , US Department of Homeland Security , Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Versfeld v. Us Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2009cv22923
Plaintiff: Neil Versfeld
Defendant: Us Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship & Immigrations Services, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?