Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,565
ANDERSON v. USA
as 4:2024cv00131
Petitioner: SANDRA ANDERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAHN v. KASPER
as 1:2024cv00150
Petitioner: JAMIE PATRICK HAHN
Respondent: JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POPE v. CHRIS et al
as 5:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant: DOCTOR SCOTT and DOCTOR CHRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADFORD v. SALES
as 5:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: AVERY BRADFORD
Defendant: WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BANDA-LOPEZ v. WELPATH et al
as 5:2024cv00331
Defendant: WELPATH, DR. BOIS RAMIREZ and GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff: MISTY SUNSHINE BANDA-LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Defendant: WARDEN RALPH SHROPSHIRE, WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART and others
Plaintiff: BRYAN L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. JONES
as 1:2024cv00149
Petitioner: OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN DESHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?