Cases 1 - 10 of 580
JACKSON v. PHYELACE et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Defendant:
DR KISSINER, DR PHYELACE, VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COAST v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 5:2024cv00309
Defendant:
ANISNE ASANI, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CALHOUN and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME COAST, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. JOHNSON, et al
as 5:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE DOWNY, JUDGE GENE JOHNSON, PAUL L HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN ANGELA REAVES and GEORGIA, STATE OF
Petitioner:
MALCOLM J JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SAMPSON
as 4:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
MACOLM J JACKSON
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00114
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Petitioner:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMY NORRIS, MALLORI F ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00108
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL
Petitioner:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN v. WORLD ALL SEVEN CONTINENTS et al
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE, WARDEN MARSHELL, VERZART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
