Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2012cv02920
Plaintiff:
Eddie Green
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Turner, Carlos Banda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Eddie Green
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Turner, Apple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2012cv02786
Plaintiff:
Eddie Green
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Turner, James Plowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. King
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Levine & Block LLP and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chambers v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00201
Petitioner:
Lorenzo L. Chambers
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe, John Doe and Erica Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv04012
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. King
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Barrett, Daffin, Frapper, Levine & Block LLP and John/Jane Doe et al
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Chase Home Finance et al
as 1:2011cv03884
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Williams
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance , Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation , JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holman v. Troup County Jail, GA et al
as 3:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Holman
Defendant:
Troup County Jail, GA, Reeves, Wanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
