Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Weddington v. Sumner et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02612
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Weddington
Defendant:
Kenneth Sumner and Steve Robert Rotella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Lopez v. Roberts
as 4:2009cv00096
Petitioner:
Antonio Lopez
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Atkins v. Roberts
as 2:2009cv00070
Petitioner:
Dwayne Anthony Atkins
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akin v. Roberts
as 4:2009cv00058
Petitioner:
Harvey Akin
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quarterman v. Donald et al
as 1:2009cv00665
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Quarterman, Jr.
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Steve Roberts, Susan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veasley v. Roberts
as 1:2009cv00637
Petitioner:
Jeremy T. Veasley
Respondent:
Steve Roberts and Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Roberts
as 1:2008cv03404
Petitioner:
Darrell E Brown, Sr.
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Roberts
as 1:2007cv03142
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Barrett
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roach v. Roberts
as 4:2007cv00219
Petitioner:
Edward L. Roach
Respondent:
Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phanhmixay v. Robert
as 1:2007cv01449
Petitioner:
Somphone Thock Phanhmixay
Respondent:
Steve Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.