Cases 11 - 20 of 2,273
Elena Saville v. Clarence Webb, et al
as 24-10998
Plaintiff:
ELENA LYADINA SAVILLE
Defendant:
CLARENCE WILLIAM WEBB, ROBERT ALLEN WHITWORTH, RANDY CLARENCE HOPPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rendon Acero et al v. USCIS et al
as 9:2024cv80480
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rendon Acero, Manuela Estrada Rendon, Mateo Estrada Rendon and others
Defendant:
USCIS, SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS, Attorney Gen. MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
McDougall v. Yellow Card Renovations LLC
as 5:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Thomas McDougall
Defendant:
Yellow Card Renovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kontis et al v. Mississippi Green Oil, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
David M. Kontis and Scott Shier
Defendant:
Mississippi Green Oil, LLC, Thomas J. Moore III and Charles T. Hill
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Matthews v. Assured Health Group, LLC
as 9:2024cv80579
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthews
Defendant:
Assured Health Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
