Cases 21 - 30 of 137,978
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FARSIAN v. ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
as 0:2024cv61027
Plaintiff:
KOUROSH FARSIAN
Defendant:
ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Greenberg
as 0:2024cv61035
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Diamonds Direct USA, Inc. v. I-Luxury Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02613
Plaintiff:
Diamonds Direct USA, Inc.
Defendant:
I-Luxury Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Solomon Brothers Jewelers and Lynn Tu
Kirziejonek v. Elma Transport Inc.
as 8:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Richard Kirziejonek
Defendant:
Elma Transport Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tom v. Forbes & York Insurance LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
David Tom
Defendant:
Forbes & York Insurance LLC doing business as MedAdvantage Partners and Assurance Pivot, LLC, The doing business as SkyBridge Leads
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Martinez Cordero v. Academy LTD
as 6:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Emanuelle Martinez Cordero
Defendant:
Academy LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
