Cases 31 - 40 of 1,717
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mi00001
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Adam Smith
as 24-10044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM H. SMITH
Smith IV et al v. Regions Bank
as 6:2023cv02407
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Smith IV and Tina Carracedo
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation et al v Smith Design Studios
as 1:2023cv05670
Plaintiff:
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation and Law Offices of Ronald I. Kaplan, MD, LLC
Defendant:
Smith Design Studios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc et al
as 1:2023cv05560
Petitioner:
Nikita J. Griffin
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
In re: Henry Smith
as 23-13920
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
DONALD MCMILLIAN, MARY B. WINDOM and STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Smith
as 1:2023mc24459
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Shirline Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
