Cases 61 - 70 of 755
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
David MartinIn re: David Martin
as 23-11469
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID MARTIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Dale GoinsIn re: Dale Goins
as 23-11141
Petitioner:
In re: DALE DEAN GOINS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Eddie Williams, Jr.In re: Eddie Williams, Jr.
as 23-11052
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Carlton McKissicIn re: Carlton McKissic
as 23-10917
Petitioner:
In re: CARLTON MCKISSIC
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Arthur Clark
as 23-10919
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR LAWTON CLARK
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Mance v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023mi00016
Plaintiff:
Justin Solomon Mance
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 No Cause Specified
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
In re: Michael Rufus
as 23-10838
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
