Cases 1 - 10 of 141
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC & CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. BARNHART
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00665
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Calhoun State Prison
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Parker
Defendant:
Calhoun State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
as 7:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, CALVIN PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORENCE v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, Mayor SKIP HENDERSON, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
