Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United State of America v. Horse Creek Family Medicine Inc
as 6:2020cv01354
Plaintiff:
United State of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Horse Creek Family Medicine Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hatcher v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv08053
Petitioner:
Howard Lester Hatcher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLS
as 7:2018cv00106
Defendant:
JUDY S NICHOLS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
United States of America for the Use of RC Interiors, Inc. v. Persaud Companies, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv80909
Defendant:
Persaud Companies, Inc. and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use of RC Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 0437
United States of America v. Crossfield
as 2:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Regina C. Crossfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Gill
as 1:2007cv02379
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
William Gill
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
United States of America v. Southeastern Commercial Finishing, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00467
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Southeastern Commercial Finishing, Inc., Joshua A. Nickelson, CAL, Inc. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SOUTHEASTERN COMMERCIAL FISHING INC et al
as 4:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN COMMERCIAL FINISHING INC, JOSHUA A NICKELSON, CAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
