All Other Real Property Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sapp v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, Attachments, and Improvements of 8 lots in Moore Place Subdivision on Clark Place Road, Designated as Lots 1 thru 8 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, Attachments, and Improvements of 8 lots in Moore Place Subdivision on Clark Place Road, Designated as Lots 1 thru 8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Sapp v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at Clarks Place, Road Called "Landfill Buffer/Future Expansion", Tax Parcel No.: 082040A, Consisting of Approxi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at Clarks Place, Road Called "Landfill Buffer/Future Expansion", Tax Parcel No.: 082040A and The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at Clarks Place, Road Called "Land", Tax Parcel No.: 082042, Consisting of Approximately 132.96 Acres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Dynamic Collision LLC et al v. Gadsden, City of, Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01583
Plaintiff: Dynamic Collision LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: ZLA Solutions Inc, Butler Properties LLC, Clark Greer and others
Defendant: Gadsden, City of, Alabama and Gadsden Airport Authority
Intervenor Defendant: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Doggett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00588
Plaintiff: Noel D. Clark, Jr.
Defendant: Linda Doggett, Deena T. Voydatch, Morgan Voydatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarke et al v. Tannin, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00572
Plaintiff: Kendall Clarke , Carolyn Clarke , Jose Rivera and others
Defendant: Tannin, Inc., George Gounares , 3D Properties, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Flat Rock African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv00004
Petitioner: Flat Rock African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.
Respondent: Tarmara C. Clark, Bank of America, N.A. , Jerry W. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clark v. Golter et al
as 8:2015cv01769
Plaintiff: Norma Clark
Defendant: Kimberly A. Golter and Laszlo Prahar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Inc v. Clark et al
as 6:2013cv01491
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Inc
Defendant: Roger D Clark, Jana W Clark, Patrick H Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Athens-Clarke County Unified G, et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al
as 13-12637
Plaintiff - Appellant: ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY UNIFIED GOVERNMENT, Athens-Clarke County Unified Government, by and through Nancy Denson, Chair of the Commission and Mayor, Athens-Clarke County Unified Government, Georgia, CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Clayton County, by and through Eldrin Bell, Chairman, Board of Commissioners, Clayton County, Georgia, SUMTER COUNTY, Sumter County, by and through Randy Howard, Chairman, Board of Commissioners, Sumter County, Georgia and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator for Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a federally chartered private corporation and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A Federally Chartered Private Corporation
Clark et al v. Swanson et al
as 1:2012cv03984
Plaintiff: Gene Clark and Les Brown
Defendant: Richard M. Swanson and Russell Swanson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?