Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Talcott v. Kusch
as 0:2023cv61039
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Talcott
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Kusch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
v. Talcott et al
as 0:2023cv61038
Defendant:
Robert H. Talcott and Jeffrey C. Kusch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
White et al v. McDougall et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ann White, Nursetel and Nursetel Employees
Defendant:
Skye McDougall, Karri Lynne Hoerner, Kathleen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Alexander v. Medley et al
as 1:2021cv24254
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Alexander
Defendant:
Attorney Ashland R. Medley, Ashland Medley Law and Judge Michael A Hanzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schroeder v. Gamma Phi Beta et al
as 1:2021cv23373
Plaintiff:
Joseph H Schroeder, II
Defendant:
Gamma Phi Beta and Jenna Ann Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adacia v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv22298
Plaintiff:
Douglas H. Adacia
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County and 10 Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimball v. Better Business Bureau of West Florida et al
as 4:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Kimball
Defendant:
Better Business Bureau of West Florida and Better Business Bureau of Metro Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Kimball v. Better Business Bureau West FL, et al
as 13-15286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD H. KIMBALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF WEST FLORIDA and BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF METRO ATLANTA
Kimball v. Better Business Bureau of West Florida et al
as 4:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Kimball
Defendant:
Better Business Bureau of West Florida and Better Business Bureau of Metro Atlanta
Davis v. Green et al
as 1:2012cv03549
Plaintiff:
Roderic D. Davis
Defendant:
Carlos C. Green and Thomas H. Pough, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
