Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Collins v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv14310
Plaintiff:
Leslie Collins
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP. and Coloplast Manufacturing US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cantrell v. Coloplast Corp et al
as 2:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Corp and Coloplast Manufacturing US LLC
Plaintiff:
Karel Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02662
Defendant:
ANALYTIC BIOSURGICAL SOLUTIONS, DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE, MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juckett v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 6:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Juckett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wroten v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv01255
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC, Mentor Corporation and Coloplast Corp.
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wroten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER et al v. COLOPLAST CORP et al
as 1:2019cv00050
Defendant:
COLOPLAST AS, MPATHY MEDICAL DEVICES INC, PORGES SA and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM COOPER and DONNA COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 6:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
Melissa G. Smith and Keith E. Smith
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burdalski v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
PATRICE BURDALSKI
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medwick v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
FRANCES MEDWICK
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilcox v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOLENE WILCOX
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
